Charles river bridge v. warren bridge 1837
Background: A dispute between two Massachusetts bridge companies arose over which had the right to construct a bridge across the Charles River between Cambridge and Boston. One had a charter from the state which granted them a monopoly on the bridge, while the other had recently applied for a charter from the legislature to construct a toll-free bridge.
Issue: Which companies charter took precedence in this matter?
Ruling/Impact: Contrary to the previous rulings of the Fletcher v. Peck and Dartmouth College cases, Taney ruled the object of the government was to promote the general happiness of the country's citizens, and this responsibility took precedence over the rights of contract and property. The state, therefore, could amend a contract if it was needed to promote the general welfare of the populous. This reflected the Jacksonian ideal of equal economic opportunities for all which favored newer companies. The second company was able to obtain a charter for their toll-free bridge.
Issue: Which companies charter took precedence in this matter?
Ruling/Impact: Contrary to the previous rulings of the Fletcher v. Peck and Dartmouth College cases, Taney ruled the object of the government was to promote the general happiness of the country's citizens, and this responsibility took precedence over the rights of contract and property. The state, therefore, could amend a contract if it was needed to promote the general welfare of the populous. This reflected the Jacksonian ideal of equal economic opportunities for all which favored newer companies. The second company was able to obtain a charter for their toll-free bridge.